Month: October 2015

On the 29th October, Lord Puttnam hosted the launch of UKTI’s ‘Shopping is GREAT’ campaign with Douglas Barnes at the Consulate General in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

The ‘Shopping is GREAT’ campaign builds upon last year’s successful campaign and is part of a regional project in which Malaysia, Philippines and Thailand are also taking part. It allows the British government to showcase Britain as a world-class leader in creativity and design talent by highlighting the increase in British brands in Vietnam. 

The opening event featured British cars and a fashion show to display the British brands available in Vietnam. It also launched a competition to win a trip to London and a number of other promotional events. 

                      

This week, Lord Puttnam undertakes his fifth Trade Mission as the Prime Minister’s Trade and Cultural Envoy to Vietnam, Cambodia, Burma and Laos. 

Lord Puttnam will visit ASEAN member states Cambodia, Vietnam and Laos, undertaking an extensive programme of activity comprising events and activities centring on a range of sectors, including Education, Transport and the Creative Industries. 

In Cambodia, Lord Puttnam will build on work undertaken during previous visits, further developing relationships with stakeholders across the commercial and public sectors in order to catalyse business opportunities for British businesses in-market. 

In Vietnam (Ho Chi Minh City and Hanoi), Lord Puttnam will cement the good work taken during the Prime Minister’s recent Northern Powerhouse Mission. He will, in Ho Chi Minh City, launch the Shopping is GREAT campaign and British Council’s UK Film Week 2015. 

In Laos, Lord Puttnam will continue to raise awareness of the importance of Higher Education and English language skills. As part of this, he will launch the UK University Education Fair.

On the 26th October, Lord Puttnam took part in an event run by the YPO WPO organisation in Singapore. 

The event, 'Connect with Lord Puttnam' allowed him to present, 'What have I learned' to an audience of WPO YPO company members. 

Lord Puttnam discussed the importance of creativity, 'where good ideas come from' and shared experiences from his own career.  

image from YPO presentation

On 26th October, David Puttnam delivered LaSalle’s eighth film lecture ‘in person’ at their campus in Singapore.

This was the latest in a series of lectures delivered by Atticus Education, David Puttnam’s online education company through which he uses HD video-conferencing to deliver live interactive film seminars to students around the world, from his home in Ireland.

However, for this lecture, ‘The Role of Casting and Performance’, David travelled to Singapore to meet his students and give them an opportunity for them for a Q&A session in person.  

David Puttnam will return to LaSalle on November 9th to Deliver the second of his 'in person' lectures, 'The Role of Sound and Music'. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Photos: ©2015 Vaishagh Sabu 

The future of public service television will be examined by a wide-ranging inquiry overseen by former Channel 4 deputy chair Lord Puttnam.

The inquiry, designed to unpick the challenges facing by broadcasters, will look at ways that public service content can be “nurtured”, including growing the range of services, platforms, funding models, developing technology and overcoming audience fragmentation.

The investigation will discover ways to secure a pipeline of quality content which “informs and inspires, entertains and educates, connects and challenges” audiences in the face of declining investment from PSBs.

It will focus on the impact of substantial BBC budget cuts of recent years.

The inquiry will be split between two bodies – an Advisory Committee will provide guidance on the framing and remit of the inquiry, backed by a Broadcast Panel of industry experts.

A series of events examining issues such as culture and economics in contemporary television will be held over the next few months, ahead of the publication of the inquiry’s findings in June.

The inquiry, which is based at the Media and Communications department of Goldsmiths, University of London, is keen to hear from interested parties.

Puttnam highlighted the “worrying fall in investment” in public service television, singling out arts, news and drama and the “tendency for younger audiences to migrate away to new digital platforms”.

“We now find ourselves in a situation where new players like YouTube and Vice are able to complement some of the work of traditional PSB providers,” he said.

“So surely the time has come to reconsider exactly what we mean by ‘public service’ content and consider new the regulatory structures that will ensure the UK public continues to be served by high-quality, original free to air television.”

Source: Broadcast Now; Matthew Campelli; 26/10/15

 

Oscar-winning film producer Lord Puttnam has warned of a “worrying fall in investment” in arts, news and drama on television ahead of a new inquiry he will spearhead into the future of UK broadcasting.

Lord Puttnam

The Labour peer and former Channel 4 deputy chairman spoke out with the future of the BBC uncertain as part of its 10-yearly charter renewal and the prospect of privatisation looming over Channel 4.

Puttnam will chair an independent inquiry set up by Goldsmiths, University of London, to look into the future of public service broadcasting and the entire TV landscape in the age of on-demand services such as House of Cards broadcaster Netflix.

“Public service broadcasters remain at the heart of our broadcast landscape in the UK but we are seeing a worrying fall in investment in key areas such as arts, news and drama as well as the tendency for younger audiences to migrate to new digital platforms,” said Puttnam.

“We now find ourselves in a situation where new players like YouTube and Vice are able to complement some of the work of traditional public service broadcasters [such as the BBC, ITV and Channel 4].

“So surely the time has come to reconsider exactly what we mean by ‘public service’ content and consider new the regulatory structures that will ensure the UK public continues to be served by high-quality, original free-to-air television.”

The new inquiry will hold a series of events beginning next month and ending with the publication of its findings in June next year.

It will run parallel to the debate around the BBC, with the government’s white paper on the future of the corporation expected in the spring next year after the green paper published in July.

BBC director general Tony Hall will say before the end of this year where he will look to make some of the savings to meet the £700m cost of free licence fees for the over-75s, taken on by the BBC after its latest funding settlement.

The government is also examining the possible privatisation of Channel 4, revealed after an official was photographed entering Downing Street with a document outlining options for a sell-off.

Puttnam, deputy chair of Channel 4 from 2006 to 2012, has been a staunch defender of the broadcaster in the past but has also said its remit needed to be updated.

Ruling himself out of the chairmanship of the BBC in 2007, Puttnam said: “As an institution it is far from perfect, but it does continue to offer the possibility of an eventual victory for sanity over nihilism in the evolution of the nation’s media output.”

Des Freedman, professor of media and communication studies at Goldsmiths, who will lead the inquiry alongside Lord Puttnam, said: “We want to make sure the wider public service broadcasting environment is not marginalised by the very necessary focus on the BBC and charter review.

“We want to look at the whole landscape of television, not least the future of Channel 4 and the contribution made by new players. We want to make a contribution to the debate [about the BBC] and pick up some of the ideas as they emerge, particularly from the white paper.”

Public service channels continue to account for the majority of viewing and spending on original content in the UK. However, real-terms investment in public service content is declining, prompted partly by cuts at the BBC, and the amount spent on sports rights in the UK has soared.

Inquiry partners include the British Academy, Bafta, Vice, the Hansard Society and the Guardian.

Media regulator Ofcom published the results of its own public service broadcasting review in July. It said broadcasters were failing to reflect minority groups on TV, with more than half of black people, disabled people and lesbian, gay and bisexual people saying they are underrepresented.

It also identified issues with the way people in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland saw themselves represented on screen.

Puttnam, the producer of films including Chariots of Fire, Bugsy Malone and The Killing Fields, was one of the key players in the debate around the 2003 Communications Act. He described television as a “delicate ecology”.

Source- The Guardian; John Punkett; 26/10/15

 

On Wednesday 21 October, Lord Puttnam attended the China State Visit of President Xi Jinping to London. 

Lord Puttnam attended a "Creative Collaborations: UK & China" event at Lancaster House with the President of the People's Republic of China, Mr Xi Jinping, his wife, Madame Peng Liyuan, The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and a number of other guests. 

 

View image | gettyimages.com

 

View image | gettyimages.com

 

View image | gettyimages.com

 Follow David Puttnam on Twitter @Dputtnam 

David Puttnam is interviewed by Ross Ashcroft for the RenegadeInc. new podcast series, 'Thinking Differently'. 

In the episode's first half, David Puttnam shares memories from his childhood, discusses his career and inspirations as a film producer as well as his work in the House of Lords and his role in shaping public policy for climate change.

 

 

On Wednesday 7th October, Lord Puttnam, Chair of the Academic Board for Pearson College, attended the Pearson College Graduation Ceremony. 

He congratulated the new graduates and their families, spoke about the the genuine engagement by teachers with the aspirations of their students at Pearson College, and wished the students all the luck in the world in making their dreams come true.

Lord Puttnam with graduates from Pearson College   

 

 

 

 

 

 

Follow David Puttnam on Twitter 

Ireland could become one of the world’s great centres of education. But our schools and colleges are failing a generation, says David Puttnam – film-maker, ‘digital champion’, Labour peer and west Cork resident – who despairs of policymakers’ lack of vision. 

The venue is within walking distance of his Cork-bound train. The bar is tourist bedlam and the only option is a sofa in the lobby. He hasn’t eaten all day, but they don’t serve food in the lobby. David Puttnam smiles the benign smile of a man who loves Ireland enough to want to live and die here but still doesn’t quite get it. 

I whisper to a passing staff member that the soft-spoken man with the little black knapsack is a famous film-maker, that he’s 74 and has been working all day for Ireland, and could they find it in their hearts to bring him a slab of beef between a couple of slices of white bread, for pity’s sake. They turn out to be graciousness itself. 

If pressed I could have added that he produced The Mission, The Killing Fields, Chariots of Fire, Midnight Express, Bugsy Malone and Local Hero. That his films have scooped 10 Oscars, 25 Baftas and a Palme d’Or. That he holds 45 honorary degrees from universities around the world. That he chose to take on the role of Ireland’s “digital champion” three years ago for no other reason than a fierce conviction that we Irish must do better by our young. And that progressive educationalists in Ireland think we’re very lucky to have him.

Digital champions, in officialese, are “ambassadors for the digital agenda”, appointed by EU states “to help every European become digital”. Puttnam was chosen by the Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources to provide “leadership” and “inspiration” in Ireland, and to “help achieve our national digital strategy”. 

There is no mystery about how a tiring moviemaker became a relentless advocate for the democratisation of education. As the child of an dearly loved photojournalist father and ambitious, combative mother – “she was a shouter; some people had the Christian Brothers, I had my mum” – he won a prized place at grammar school. 

“No one turned up at that grammar school wanting to be more successful” than he did, he says. But by the end of the first term it was over. Apart from the history teacher “there was no connection whatsoever. None. So they start telling me I’m useless. I’m written off.” He got 81 per cent in O-level history, thereby proving he wasn’t “completely stupid”. Yet, he says, “there was never even that conversation that maybe I was being badly taught.” 

Creative bright sparks 

He was rescued by the sense of possibility and opportunity pervading Britain in the late 1950s and early 1960s. Working as a messenger for an advertising agency, he enrolled in night school, designed his own curriculum and discovered a voracious appetite for learning. The agency fast-tracked him into a training programme, where he sat alongside the likes of Alan Parker, Ridley Scott and Charles Saatchi, a slew of creative bright sparks not cut in the system’s mould. 

He still thinks of himself as a marketing man who makes movies. “I never ever thought of myself as an artist. I’m a facilitator. I’m good at getting people to work together, good at encouraging them to do better work than they imagine they might. But there’s not an artistic bone in my body.” 

That engaging realism has combined with an enduring thirst for data and knowledge, a mastery of communication and a deadly serious intent to make him a formidable operator. 

His entire film career involved dealing in celluloid, yet his advocacy for digital technology is total and immensely practical. 

The impact of technology on education, he says, is akin to the impact of the machine gun on warfare. “We are living in a new world. The average is over. There was a time when you could have an average job and an average income and have a reasonably comfortable, average life. That’s over.” 

Yes, it’s frightening. “Four out of five jobs for the young will absolutely rely on them having the full complement of digital skills. About 30 to 40 per cent of those jobs will be jobs we didn’t even know existed.” 

We probably have until about 2025 before it all kicks off. 

There will be no rescue then for children dumped by the system. This is what drives him. It’s why he visibly tenses when doubts are raised about the value of technology in schools. The day we meet, the doubters are getting media space because of a report based on students’ performance in the OECD’s controversial Programme for International Student Assessment, or Pisa, tests. 

“It seems to be saying we were bypassing teachers,” he says. “Now I adore teachers. I spent six years of my life working hand in glove with them. I created the national [British] teacher awards. I also have this wonderful job chairing the Times Educational Supplement advisory board, and I get an enormous amount of data.” 

And this much is clear, he says. “Technology becomes valuable when the people using it are well trained, well equipped, confident and imaginative. Technology is not especially valuable if it’s in the hands of people who don’t know what to do with it, who don’t necessarily believe in it, and who haven’t actually bothered to ask the children in their class what it means in their life.” 

It’s a generational problem, he believes. To the overwhelming majority of young teachers “technology is just food and drink”. They’re the ones who sign up to what he calls the “teacher-led revolution” that is TES Connect, the Times Educational Supplement’s online social platform. 

More than seven million education professionals from 197 countries, including about 55,000 from Ireland, have 1.4 million conversations a day with other teachers on the site, downloading teaching materials, posting ideas, looking for inspiration, connecting with students. 

Irish subscribers have downloaded more than two million resources in the past year, he says – “and doing this in many cases almost unknown to their head teachers, who don’t have an interest in this kind of thing. They have no doubt whatsoever that they need to use this technology, but they don’t have a voice”.

A lot of the spokespersons, whether from unions or Government departments, are from Puttnam’s generation, he says. On the teaching side they have no wish to rethink their professional skills; on the policymaking side they’re looking for ways to avoid spending money. Obstructive forces are at work in both areas, he suggests. 

“I’ve been in politics a long time now . . . and I know there are two ways of looking at policy development. One is to say this is our vision of how education should look in 2020-2025, because we actually believe if Ireland is going to be a seriously competitive nation we will have the skills to address that. 

“The other way is to say we’ve been talking to the guys in the Department of Finance and they’re very worried about how we can save some money, and so we’ll lower our expectations, and our vision, down to what they say is affordable, so we won’t be embarrassed if we can’t deliver on the vision.” 

This is not a case of good guys versus bad guys, he says. “But the problem is, approach number two destroys the opportunities possible for an entire generation of Irish men and women. I passionately believe that the right way is to look at what’s possible on behalf of the next generation of young people and then pull every single lever you can.”

Are we not doing that? 

“No,” he says, “we are certainly not doing it to the degree to which it’s possible.” 

Working with Pat Rabbitte, who made him digital champion, was wonderful, he says. “Ruairí Quinn was great. I feel he was trying to move the education needle aggressively, which is what it needed. They had a vision.” Ciarán Cannon, the Fine Gael TD and former minister for training and skills, is a “big loss to Government”, Puttnam says. “He understands the process and is very credible and really passionate in this area. In any well-run country, people like Ciarán should be used to the ultimate. I don’t feel what he has to offer has been given anything like enough credit.” 

Attention from the top 

Puttnam has a suggestion for the Taoiseach – “whom I happen to like very much”. He wants Enda Kenny “to call in Department of Education officials every week, for 15 minutes, and ask, ‘What’s happened this week?’ Because if you get attention from the top, things happen.” 

The idea comes from Puttnam’s first job related to education, in 1997, when David Blunkett, the education secretary in the shiny new Tony Blair government, asked Puttnam to use his reputation as a film-maker to delve into school staffrooms, which had a serious morale problem. 

“We got an awful lot done in the first 1½ terms, as Blair would insist on being updated once a week on what was happening in education. So there was real pressure – ‘What’s happened?’ ‘What has changed?’ ‘What is better this week?’ – and we managed to push through some extraordinary things. And that was against some relative frugality.” 

But, then again, Ireland is not doing too badly. Okay, we may be “slipping a bit further behind the UK”, as Puttnam says, but he adds that we’re ahead of France and Germany and way ahead of southern Europe. So we’re not the worst, surely. 

He suppresses a sigh. He deplores and fears this “all things considered we’re doing quite well” attitude. 

Puttnam recalls working with Singapore while it was building itself into a powerhouse, when “all it had was people . . . and that quality of commitment, vision, leadership, and huge emphasis on education.” 

Nobody wasted time being nice at meetings, he says. “It was, ‘Please identify what we’re doing wrong or could do better, what could be great and what could be excellent.’ That was the whole emphasis of every conversation. I’m not convinced those conversations are taking place here. 

“I sincerely believe there is a fantastic opportunity for this country, partly because other countries dropped the ball. Equally I know there are other countries that are extremely ambitious, who have more vision, who feel they have more to lose and are prepared to take more chances.” 

Vietnam is an example. “Did you know there are now more middle-class people in Asia than in the US and Europe combined? And those middle-class parents are spending up to 30 per cent of their combined incomes on their children’s education. Why? No pensions. The child is the pension. 

“In the West we’ve got a fallback. Something like 50-60 per cent of all the world’s social security is spent in Europe. That’s our way of doing it. I’m not against social security – I’m a Labour peer – but it’s how you utilise the social-security blanket as underpinning. The net result is that you lose ambition, lose focus, lose vision, lose the ability to imagine what your future might be. Then, yeah, you’ve got a problem.” 

Puttnam never raises his voice, but his tone intensifies as he continues. “I love this country, and I will, please God, die here. But the argument is this: are we in this country engaged in managing decline or is there genuine vision and aspiration for all the people in this country? If there is, the only starting place is education, and the only way you can drive it through is education. 

“I want to make sure that all the right questions are being asked about the vision for education. Not the practicalities of it, not the affordability of it, but what is the vision of it – and then how do you go about delivering that vision?” 

He notes that, in “the years of plenty”, education expenditure as a percentage of GDP went down, not up. “When someone could have had the vision, when we wanted to be the best-educated workforce in the world, this country got a lot of useless buildings, bankers ripping you off, and a kind of cultural catastrophe.”

What is Ireland doing wrong? 

He has other questions about Irish vision and focus. “Ireland has got this fantastic opportunity, largely made possible by British visa restrictions, to become one of the world’s great centres of education. What I can’t get anyone to explain to me is why New Zealand, which is almost exactly the same size as Ireland in terms of population, has something like four times as many foreign students as Ireland. What is New Zealand doing right that Ireland is doing wrong? Answer: imagination and conviction.” 

Does he want to continue as Ireland’s digital champion? 

“I don’t want to have failed in this job. They are very generous with me. They do make me feel valued. I don’t expect to get a red card, but I can’t go on forever. I’m 74 and by far the oldest digital champion in Europe, by about 30 years, and I want to make sure that by the time I’m gone something tangible really has been put in there.” 

If that sounds like a long goodbye, think again. The man who stood down from film-making at 55, burnt out and disenchanted with Hollywood values, is in movie mode again, pulled back by a fierce sense of urgency about his other great urgent passion: climate change. 

Sceptics of climate change, he says, bear a “terrifying similarity” to those on the education side. “I either spend the next three or four years of my life wittering on in the House of Lords on the subject or find another way of getting the message across.” 

The film is based on the book Don’t Trust, Don’t Fear, Don’t Beg, an account of the Arctic 30, the Greenpeace activists who spent more than three months in a Russian detention centre just before the Winter Olympics in Sochi, after being arrested for “piracy” when they tried to board a Russian oil rig. Already he’s working with Emma Thompson; Marion Cotillard and Emma Stone – “people I’d chop my left arm off to work with” – are also on his wish list, he says as we walk smartly towards the Cork train, towards home and Skibbereen. “I think we’ve never had a better group of actors.”

Read the original article on The Irish Times

Follow David Puttnam on Twitter