Month: May 2016

Bringing digital skills to the young, the old and the marginalised

From young coders to former prisoners, Ashoka Ireland’s Fiona Koch highlights three social organisations that are empowering millions through technology.

Niamh Scanlon and David Puttnam may be separated by over 60 years in age, but they share an important mission. Both advocate for the benefits of digital technologies in improving society, helping disconnected or underrepresented groups of people to gain better access to technology.

Scanlon, 13, was named EU Digital Girl of the Year in 2015, while Puttnam, who turned 75 this February, has served as Ireland’s Digital Champion since 2012, and both play key roles in promoting the use of technology as a means for self-empowerment.

“Reaching out to the elderly, the disconnected among them, is a big part of the job,” Puttnam said of his work as he addressed the Silicon Republic Digital Ireland Forum in 2014. This was never more evident than on a sunny day this May, when he attended a computer skills workshop in the headquarters of Third Age, a national voluntary organisation seeking to elevate the value of elderly retirees in their communities, while filming an episode for his RTÉ documentary series on digital trends in Ireland.

Founder Mary Nally, introduced computer literacy classes to Third Age over 15 years ago, in order to transform the lives of the isolated elderly living in her rural hometown of Summerhill, Co. Meath. Now in her sixties herself, Nally wanted to share the feeling of empowerment that she gained when she learned how to use a computer and access the internet.

“Everything is digitalised today – from banking to shopping and more. Why should [the elderly] be left behind? At Third Age, we want to take the fear out of computing,” she explained during Puttnam’s visit.

“I know some older people have embraced technology, and others are afraid. I want to encourage everyone to say, ‘Maybe I will.’”

Joining Puttnam for the workshop was the well-known Irish Gaelic games commentator Mícheál Ó Muircheartaigh, who extolled the virtues of Skype for allowing him to “put the kettle on and share a cup of tea” via video call with his four children living abroad.

Puttnam, who is a passionate champion of digital technologies in education, explained how video-conferencing technology has enabled him to teach film students in six universities around the world from the comfort of his garage, calling it “a rejuvenating experience.”

Puttnam was keen to emphasise the importance of promoting digital skills in all ages. At 75, he says, “I’m working as hard as I’ve ever worked in my life, and if all goes well, I’ll have another ten years to look forward to. For young people growing up today, they could be working until they are 100! We are living in a world where change is a constant.”

Source: Silicon Republic

Written by: Fiona Koch

REVIEW: Puttnam plays Puttnam at the Apex

David Puttnam, holder of 10 Oscars and 25 BAFTAS, hasn’t made a film since 1998, but remains a masterful presence over the genre, especially when it comes to music, as he demonstrated last night to a rapt audience at The Apex.

And he’s also a supreme talent-spotter, as his many successful celluloid collaborations – see above – over the years have proved. So it is perhaps a tad ironic or, to quote the great man: ‘wonderful’ that he found some right under his nose in the lithe form of his son Sacha, a lyrical pianist and himself a music arranger.

They began to work together  on stage only recently after a family friend remarked: “Hey, David, you shot and he scores!”

That was one of the many gentle and modest anecdotes Lord Puttnam told before introducing his son to play pieces from his films using his own arrangements, but capturing the majesty of them as stills were projected onto the back of the stage. He was ably supported by violinist Rosemary Hinton.

The unique concept all made for an enthralling and enchanting evening with a good measure of intimacy and openness, which clearly entranced the audience from the opening of Love Theme from Midnight Express and the closing Killing Fields theme, written by Mike Oldfield, a score Puttnam reckons the composer of Tubular Bells did not get enough credit for.

In between we were swept along by the usual favourites, from Chariots of Fire and Local Hero, along with surprises like Nessum Dorma, which is in Killing Fields and, according to Puttnam led to the formation of the Three Tenors.

It was links and stories like that which held the evening together and left the audience with a useful repertoire of movie trivia.

So if someone this weekend asks you questions like this: Who got rid of the rats on the set of The Mission, and why couldn’t he get rid of the mosquitoes? Or: Which film re-united Jack Wild and Mark Lester from Oliver! Or: Why is the Chariots of Fire theme by Vangelis only played at the opening and closing credits and not in the film itself? Or: What’s the most popular tune used in wedding videos? You can be sure that person was at The Apex on Tuesday night.

Written by Paul Richardson 
Source: Bury Free Press

Brexit would be a disaster for Ireland and UK

A vote to leave the European Union would hurt this country every bit as much as the UK, writes David Puttnam

 

A month ahead of the referendum in the United Kingdom on its membership of the European Union, and writing as someone who is able to effortlessly regard each of these neighbouring islands as home, I find myself increasingly concerned about the possible outcome from the perspective of both British and Irish citizens.

Despite being a member of the House of Lords, on this occasion I'll be able to vote and I will be firmly ticking the 'Remain' box on June 23. The choice is an easy one for me. 

It's informed both by my daily experience of life and a sincere belief that the colossal decision facing us is, in terms of its political, economic and social ramifications, the most important to be made in a generation. 

While I don't for one moment take for granted the voices and opinions of multiple business leaders and those many others who have voiced their opposition to 'Brexit', I tend to view the referendum from the perspective of the world I know best: that's to say its likely effect on jobs in the film, TV and other creative industries.

I know enough to be thoroughly convinced that life outside the EU would massively impoverish the United Kingdom, both culturally and financially. 

I think, at the very minimum, 'Brexit' raises a number of questions to which I've yet to hear any remotely satisfactory answers. 

For example, as someone who's passionate about education, I wonder if British universities would lose out on the vital research funding that's provided by EU programmes, such as Horizon 2020?

Equally, as someone who lives in both Cork and London, I've come to recognise that the destiny of our two islands is uniquely intertwined, and though borne from a complex and difficult history, the relationship is thriving as never before. We even joined the EU on the same day! Sadly, the uncertainty which a 'Brexit' result would inevitably deliver raises serious questions about the future stability of this relationship; and that holds true in a number of spheres. 

The most immediate concerns arise as a result of the shared border, across which any amount of business is now conducted efficiently and with increasing ease. 

Indeed the peace process itself, along with many of its resulting benefits, have been supported by the EU to the tune of €1.5 bn. 

The fourth 'peace programme' is due to run until 2020. Who's to tell if this will be in jeopardy? 

There are other incredibly serious issues regarding the movement of people which would need to be addressed. 

How, for example, would the 'Common Travel Area' be affected, even temporarily? What would be the impact on the eligibility of Irish and British citizens to live, work and study on either island? 

The EU has announced it's abolishing roaming charges across Europe from June 2017. Would an EU exit mean that these charges could still apply on this island, and beyond, and for all travellers to the UK?

Dozens and dozens of questions such as these, small and large, would have to be addressed and resolved.

Business leaders in Ireland, North and South, have identified other troubling concerns, such as the effects on currency exchange, energy costs and tourism. 

As Ireland's Digital Champion, I've witnessed at first-hand the importance of the Digital Single Market and the significant opportunities it brings in helping people and communities, in both islands, to develop the skills and competences which are increasingly essential to any hope of a successful 21st century future. 

I know that Irish people across the board are very supportive of Ireland's membership of the EU. An opinion poll carried out by Red C for European Movement Ireland in 2015 showed that 84pc of those living in Ireland believe that membership of the EU has benefited the country. Spending a portion of every week in both places, I can attest to the fact that what's good for Ireland is also good for Britain. 

The clearest evidence of the close historical ties between our two islands is that some half a million Irish-born people now living in Britain have the right to vote in next month's referendum. 

I hope that they will thoughtfully use this opportunity, and the significant responsibility that comes with it. 

A group made up of people from a variety of backgrounds has formed 'Irish4Europe' and is working hard to ensure that the Irish in Britain are aware of their right to vote, and urging them to do so. 

For my part, as well as voting 'Remain' next month, I'm taking part in the European Movement Ireland's #PhoneAFriend campaign. 

I feel compelled, in what I regard as the interests of sanity, to urge all of the young and not so young Irish in Britain to please register to vote by the June 7 deadline.

As someone who is now happily tucked into in my 'Third Age' I feel an enormous responsibility to future generations. In casting my vote next month, I'm particularly mindful of the legacy we'll be leaving behind for them. 

I include in this the enormous multi-faceted challenges facing our planet as a whole, not least climate change; a growing humanitarian refugee crisis; and the fragility inherent in the co-existing issues of an aging population and youth unemployment. 

As I'm sure is by now clear, I'm personally convinced that this is not the time for the United Kingdom to make a once-in-a-generation decision to cut itself off from the rest of our continent. 

I believe it's incumbent upon all of us who care about the continuing peace and prosperity of our communities to offer leadership and genuine innovation in drawing our countries closer together, rather than attempting to push them apart. 

For all of these reasons and more, I urge – in fact I beg – everyone who can, to register to vote, and exercise their democratic duty with the very greatest care and consideration on June 23. 

Written by David Puttnam

Source: Sunday Independent 

Famous film director David Puttnam and son Sacha to perform ‘multi-media live music event’ at Bury Festival

Puttnam Plays Puttnam, which comes to the venue on Tuesday May 24, is a ‘multi-media live music event’ featuring ‘classical arrangements of music from films including Chariots of Fire, The Mission, Midnight Express and The Killing Fields.

Suffolk-born violinist Rosemary Hinton, who recently graduated from the Royal Academy of Music, will be joining David (presenter) and Sacha (piano). 

Tickets; £20 for adults and £5 for under-25s are available from www.theapex.co.uk 

A discount for Festival Friends is also available. 

Starts 7.30pm.

Source: Ely Standard 

Puttnam Plays Puttnam in Southampton

WITH ten Oscars, 25 BAFTAs, the prestigious Palme d’Or at Cannes, a CBE, a knighthood, and countless honorary degrees and awards, Lord David Puttnam is one of the most successful and inspirational film-producers of our time.

His remarkable legacy of films includes The Mission,The Killing Fields, Local Hero, Chariots of Fire, Midnight Express, Bugsy Malone and Memphis Belle.

You can hear the music from his films at the Turner Sims on Sunday with the Puttnam Plays Puttnam teatime special at 3pm.

Emotive music by composers as diverse as Vangelis, Ennio Morricone, Mark Knopfler, Giorgio Moroder, Howard Blake, Puccini and Fauré is performed by his son, Sacha Puttnam to a beautiful collage of movie stills, and presented by their producer David Puttnam along with his insights into the relationship of film and music drawn from his more than 40 years making movies.

Tickets, available now from 023 8059 5151 or turnersims.co.uk, include a complimentary cup of tea and slice of cake.

Source: Hampshire Chronicle 

Cameron and Osborne praised for stance against 'assault on BBC'

Labour peer David Puttnam says there had been an attempt to impose ‘ideological agenda’, and credits PM and chancellor for their response

Labour peer David Puttnam has praised the prime minister and chancellor for “seeing off an ideological agenda” regarding the BBC in this month’s white paper.

In what will widely be interpreted as a criticism of culture secretary John Whittingdale, Puttnam told the Media Show on Radio 4 that there had been an attempt to impose an ideological agenda on the corporation.

“I think there was an attempt to run an ideological agenda that, I think, has failed,” he said. “I put that absolutely to the credit of the chancellor and prime minister. I think the prime minister and chancellor saw off an ideological agenda.”

There was a degree of relief for the BBC and its supporters earlier this month when a number of measures floated before the white paper’s publication, such as restrictions on scheduling and top-slicing of the licence fee, did not appear in the final document. 

However, Puttnam said parliament would “severely” oppose plans for the government to appoint four directors on a new BBC board, in addition to the chair and deputy chair.

“I think the idea of four of the board being appointed by the government is a dreadful idea,” said Puttnam, who is charing an inquiry into public service broadcasting. “I just think it makes no sense.

Advertisement

“I’m not just saying this as a Labour peer: don’t forget my party could just as easily be in power and I would be saying exactly the same thing.

“If it did happen it would unquestionably have a chilling affect on broadcasting … The public quite legitimately are quite suspicious of the way board appointments occur.

“It would be very, very severely challenged in parliament. This is not going to go away, this is not going to be brushed under the carpet.

“I think it will end up being major, major issue in parliament, and I know for a fact there are many many Conservatives, people who I like a lot, who will oppose this bitterly.”

He added that if the government exerted too much control over who ran the BBC, the corporation could end up like Italian state-owned broadcaster RAI, where the organisation’s leadership is replaced with each change in government.

“If we even begin to countenance that kind of interference,” he said, “it’s game over.”

Source: The Guardian 

Written by Jasper Jackson 

'What Next for the BBC?'

While the more apocalyptic predictions may not have been realised, there’s still a need to remain vigilant about threats to the BBC’s independence, as well as its ability long term to operate as a universal public service broadcaster. The most pressing issue is that the proposals for appointments to the new unitary board mean government appointees will, for the first time, sit at the heart of the BBC’s operational and editorial decision-making structures.

I’m particularly troubled by this in the light of recent situations in which a number of European governments have been able to place undue pressure on public broadcasters specifically through the appointments process.

I’d like to see an appointments process that is not contaminated by the possibility of “political or personal patronage”, the phrase used by the former commissioner for public appointments, Sir David Normington, when setting out his own concerns.

It’s also vital that Ofcom has a remit explicitly recognising the BBC’s unique position as a universal public service broadcaster, one that prevents rivals from vexatiously calling for sanctions because the BBC is being insufficiently “distinctive” – a word that rather chillingly recurs throughout the white paper. The paper also rejects the proposal that the licence fee should be set by an independent body, but I remain unconvinced that limited parliamentary scrutiny will ever be sufficient to make the process fully transparent. Finally, I’m concerned by any diminution of the public purpose on “technological innovation”. The BBC has a strong record in this area, and it would be a huge loss to both licence payers and the industry if the BBC was not tasked with developing new technologies that could operate in the broad public interest.

Written by David Puttnam

Source: The Guardian 

David Puttnam: Brexit would impoverish film, TV and creative industries

‘As Ireland’s Digital Champion, I have seen at first-hand the importance of the digital single market’

For a number of years now I’ve been one of over 250,000 British people who call Ireland their home. But I remain a British citizen and, despite being a member of the House of Lords, on this occasion I’ll be able to vote Remain in the forthcoming referendum on the UK’s continuing membership of the European Union. 

I feel very passionately on this subject, and believe it is critical the UK remains in the EU. I’ll go further; I find it deeply disturbing that a departure should even be contemplated. 

Of my fellow countrymen based here in Ireland, it’s estimated that 120,000 of us are entitled to cast vote in the referendum, and I sincerely hope every one of them registers by close of business on May 16th – the deadline to do so.

I’d also appeal to those many Irish in Britain who, because of the historical relationship between our two islands, have the right to make their vote count in the referendum. I know that Irish people are very supportive of Ireland’s membership of the EU. 

An opinion poll carried out by Red C for European Movement Ireland in 2015 showed that 84 per cent of people living in Ireland believe membership of the EU has benefited the country. Spending a portion of every week in both places, I know for sure that what’s good for Ireland is also good for Britain.

Business and other leaders, who have voiced concerns in public, have focused on the implications of a Brexit on our shared border and our Common Travel Area, both of which are very important. Other dimensions of our lives will also be affected though, should the UK do the unthinkable and leave the union.

Interlinked destiny

The destiny of our two islands has been interlinked and, while borne from a complex and difficult history, the relationship is a thriving one in the fields of arts, culture, business, education and technology. 

From the perspective of the world I know best, the film, TV and creative industries, life outside of the EU would be massively impoverished, both culturally and financially. Membership of the EU has supported and enhanced the peace process for the greater good of both islands. 

Structural funds and the single market have led to growth and economic prosperity separately, as well as between our two economies. 

The protection of women’s rights through a large body of EU legislation prohibiting discrimination – on equal pay and equal rights for women in the workplace, including maternity leave – were also vital to improving equality. 

As Ireland’s Digital Champion, I have also seen at first-hand the importance of the digital single market and the significant opportunities it brings for both islands to work together in helping people and organisations to develop skills which are increasingly essential to our living and working together in the 21st century.

Finally, I would like to turn to the global issues which face us. Among these, the impacts of climate change and the growing refugee crisis are particularly pressing, but there are others such as the co-existing demographic challenges of ageing and youth unemployment.

Collaborative solutions

I’d argue that never before in human history have we experienced a set of multifaceted problems which, by their very nature, require us to collaborate and share responsibility for urgent but sustainable solutions. It is the worst imaginable moment for a great nation like the United Kingdom to make a once-in-a-generation decision to become isolated and insular. 

As well as voting Remain next month, I’m taking part in the European Movement Ireland’s #PhoneAFriend campaign. I feel compelled to act. I can only hope that the 5.5 million Irish diaspora in the UK, including the 500,000 Irish-born citizens living in Britain, will exercise their right to vote by registering online by June 7th. 

I urge you to think long and hard about the colossal choice facing all of us. 

This vote affects far more people than those 64 million living in the UK; it will dramatically impact our children, along with those future generations for whom we carry a huge responsibility. 

Source: The Irish Times 

Press Release: A Future For Public Service Television Inquiry – Response to BBC Charter White Paper

The Inquiry, chaired by Lord Puttnam, welcomes those commitments in today’s white paper that will provide the BBC with a degree of stability and confidence at a time of huge transformations in the media landscape. We remain, however, vigilant about the threats to its independence and its remit as a universal public service broadcaster.

We have a number of concerns:

We accept that a new system of governance is necessary and believe that, if properly constituted, a unitary board is likely to serve licence fee payers more adequately than the existing setup. We believe, however, that the involvement of DCMS in the appointment of up to half of a new and powerful unitary board – including the chair and deputy chair – will not inspire public confidence and is not a sufficient guarantee that the government, in the words of the culture secretary, will “ensure [that] the independence of the BBC is beyond doubt.”
Further to the above, we would like to see an appointments process that is meaningfully independent of government and that is not contaminated by the possibility of personal or political patronage. Licence fee payers need a Board that is both free of government intervention and one that is committed to holding the BBC to account where necessary.
Regarding the BBC’s commitment to innovation, we are especially concerned that the sixth public purpose – that of developing new technologies in the public interest – has been scrapped. We feel that the BBC has made a huge contribution in the field of innovation – from the development of colour TV to the iPlayer more recently – and we would strongly argue that this purpose should be retained.
While limited parliamentary scrutiny of the government’s funding plan is provided for, the white paper firmly rejects the proposal that the licence fee should be set by an independent body. We note that the 2015 settlement requiring the BBC to pay for over-75’s tv licences was not subject to any parliamentary oversight and it is far from clear in today’s white paper, how the new process for setting the licence fee will ensure that the 2015 settlement process is never repeated.
The white paper acknowledges the need to increase accountability to the nations of the UK but there is little detail about how representative voices from the devolved nations can more fully participate in the governance and the regulation of the BBC.

We welcome:

the eleven-year charter extension which will remove the decision-making process about the future of the BBC from the electoral cycle and will create a space in which to debate and discuss how the Corporation can best respond to ongoing changes in distribution and consumption.
We are particularly pleased to see that the government has chosen to enshrine diversity as a core purpose of the BBC and we look forward to the development of concrete measures, underpinned by dedicated funding, that will transform both the employment prospects and representation of all minority communities.
We are also pleased that a whole series of proposals that would have undermined the ability of the BBC to cater fully to the needs of licence fee payers have been scrapped. We are grateful that government listened to public opinion that showed little appetite for moves to curb the scope of BBC services, to top-slice the BBC’s budget or to prevent the BBC from running popular programmes at times of its own choice.

Our Initial Response to BBC White Paper

The Inquiry welcomes those commitments in today’s White Paper that will provide the BBC with a degree of stability and confidence at a time of huge transformations in the media landscape. We remain, however, vigilant about the threats to its independence and its remit as a universal public service broadcaster.

An eleven-year charter extension will remove the decision-making process about the future of the BBC from the electoral cycle and will create a space in which to debate and discuss how the Corporation can best respond to ongoing changes in distribution and consumption.

We accept that a new system of governance is necessary and believe that, if properly constituted, a unitary board is likely to serve licence fee payers more adequately than the existing setup.

We are particularly pleased to see that the government has chosen to enshrine diversity as a core purpose of the BBC and we look forward to the development of concrete measures, underpinned by dedicated funding, that will transform both the employment prospects and representation of all minority communities. While welcoming the commitments in the White Paper we would also underline that the issue of diversity extends to all those with “protected characteristics” and we would like to see this reflected in the revised Charter.

We also welcome the commitment to investment in the future of the industry through the emphasis on the BBC supporting the development of skills training.

We believe, however, that the white paper represents a missed opportunity to develop a robust framework for ensuring the BBC’s independence. In the light of recent experience in other European countries where governments have put undue pressure on public broadcasters, it is vital that both editorial and operational decision-making are totally insulated from the interests of the government of the day. We believe that the involvement of government in the appointment of up to half of a new and powerful unitary board – including the chair and deputy chair – will not inspire public confidence and is not a sufficient guarantee that the government, in the words of the culture secretary, will “ensure [that] the independence of the BBC is beyond doubt.”

We would like to see an appointments process that is meaningfully independent of government and that is not contaminated by the possibility of political or personal patronage. Licence fee payers need a Board that is both free of government intervention and one that is committed to holding the BBC to account where necessary.

We are also concerned that Ofcom has been tasked with assuming overall regulatory functions. Given its existing duties which include competition issues, it is very well placed to assess the impact of BBC services on the wider media market and it has huge experience in arbitrating complaints. It is vital, however, that Ofcom is now provided with a regulatory remit that protects the BBC’s unique position as a universal public service broadcaster and prevents its rivals from vexatiously calling for sanctions on the basis that the BBC is not ‘distinctive’ enough – a phrase that runs throughout the white paper – or that it is treading on their ‘turf’.

One area in which this may become apparent relates to the BBC’s commitment to innovation and we are especially concerned that this commitment would appear to be under threat with the removal of the sixth public purpose: that of developing new technologies in the public interest. We feel that the BBC has made a huge contribution in the field of innovation – from the development of colour TV to the iPlayer more recently – and we would strongly argue that this purpose should be retained. As framed, the sixth purpose clearly extends beyond Digital Switchover (DSO) and it is therefore somewhat disingenuous to claim that the reason for the removal of this purpose is that DSO has now been “successfully completed.”

The White Paper acknowledges the need to increase accountability to the nations of the UK but there is little detail about how representative voices from across the nations and regions of the UK can more fully participate in the governance and the regulation of the BBC.

Above all, we remain mindful that the BBC still faces serious challenges. Despite the agreement to link the licence fee to inflation, the BBC will still be required to make huge savings over the next few years – savings that will inevitably have a negative impact on its ability to provide high quality content to all its audiences. Let us not forget that these cuts are largely the result of a licence fee settlement in 2015 that required it to pay for over-75s’ TV licences. This settlement was far from transparent – and was not subject to any parliamentary oversight – and it is far from clear how the new process for setting the licence fee will ensure that this is never repeated. The White Paper firmly rejects the proposal that the licence fee should be set by an independent body although it does now provide, at least, for limited parliamentary scrutiny of the government’s funding plans.

We intend to raise many of these points in the discussion of the white paper that will now take place and will produce a full analysis of how best to secure a thriving public service media landscape in the UK when we report on June 29th.