Month: June 2017

Blessed by a brilliant marriage, which resulted in an adored and adoring family he had no need, nor time, for rancour.

He was born into the world of cinema, so as the son of a fine director he knew better than most the passion and disappointment that went into the production of every movie – good and bad.

In hindsight my generation of filmmakers were incredibly fortunate to have enjoyed the understanding and support of a tough, sometimes unforgiving, but ultimately generous group of critics.

Philip French, Derek Malcolm, David Robinson, Alexander Walker, along with Barry, all went out of their way to seek out and promote the emergence of a cinema that was outward looking in both its subject matter and respect for its audience.

To me, through the best and worst of times, Barry was never less than a witty and affectionate friend.

I think I understood him best when, on a Film Night special in early 1982 we debated the future of the industry we both loved.

 

 

As I laid out my own thoughts on what I believed lay ahead his eyes grew wider and wider in almost pantomime consternation.

Like me he’d grown up in an era in which the local cinema was a smoky haven of silver imagery, drying raincoats, blue smoke haze and an almost religious silence.

I don’t believe he was ever able to embrace the world of DVD’s, let alone ‘streaming’ – and the idea of people checking their mobile phones, and popping in and out of the concession stand while the movie was playing, would have been anathema to him.

Barry enjoyed the best of cinema at a time when, for the most part, it returned his love.

Much as I and his legion of devoted friends will miss him, with cinema subsuming its cultural potential to a spasm of sequels and masked hero’s, he probably chose a good time to leave.

David Puttnam

STATEMENT FROM LORD PUTTNAM

Re statement by Karen Bradley, Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport on the proposed merger between 21st Century Fox and Sky – 29.06.2017

21st century fox logo white on black

I welcome the Secretary of State’s ‘minded-to’ decision to refer the proposed merger of 21st Century Fox and Sky for a fuller Phase 2 investigation by the Competition and Markets Authority on the grounds of media plurality.

I am surprised and very concerned, however, that the Secretary of State is minded-not-to-refer the merger to the CMA on the grounds of broadcasting standards.

Ofcom’s observations of ‘significant failings of the corporate culture’ at Fox News in its ‘fit and proper’ assessment are extremely troubling. As the Shadow Secretary of State remarked:

“If the executives who ran a company involved in systematic and widespread criminality, including phone hacking and police bribery, can pass the fit and proper test, it begs the question – is the test itself fit for purpose?”

As the Shadow Secretary of State’s remarks suggest, it is very possible that the regulatory regime itself is no longer ‘fit for purpose’;  that being the case, should this merger ‘slip through’, the nation will have to live with the effects of those failings for many years to come.

Finally, one question does not seem to have been addressed and that is the scale and nature of the commercial and political benefits that could accrue to the Murdoch family from access to Sky’s vast database of almost thirteen million households in the UK and the Republic of Ireland.

This could represent unaccountable power of a very different order to that which has ever existed in the past.

I believe that rather than accepting any revised undertakings in lieu, the Secretary of State should now make a final decision to refer the proposed merger, both on the grounds of plurality and broadcasting standards, to the CMA on the basis that only a full, detailed investigation, with sufficient time for proper scrutiny, and a comprehensive understanding of the implications of the contemporary world of digital media, will do justice to the public interest.