Author: pixel2coding

Source: Louise Crossen for Griffith University News, 11 Ocotber 2017. 

David Puttnam with his Students at Griffith University 2017

 One of the most celebrated figures in world cinema, Oscar-winning Lord David Puttnam, kept a sell out audience enlivened with the leading film-maker delivering a public lecture  at Griffith Film School.

Lord Puttnam, whose career as an independent producer includes classic films such as Midnight Express, The Killing Fields and Chariots of Fire will look at creative criticism in filmmaking and other business models.

Creative Collisions – It’s never easy but it’s worth it reflects on his recent time at Pixar animation studios to consult on their creative culture and processes.

“Change is tough, but you have to set the bar high and ensure that you keep pushing to create the best project possible,” he said.

“That means being open to criticism, recognising your strengths and weaknesses and fostering your creative relationships.”

Lord Puttnam will also discuss his return to the film industry. After many years as a film educator and a member of the House of Lords, he is set to produce his first film in 30 years.  Arctic30 is a drama about the real-life detention of Greenpeace activists.

Lord Puttnam has a long-standing relationship with Griffith Film School, delivering a series of live interactive seminars from his home in Ireland over the past five years that cover everything from movies and money, the use of sound and music and the evolving role of the author and producer.

He nominates classics including Breaker Morant and The Castle as his favourite Australian films and argues that the big end of town should be giving back to film education in this country – creating scholarships and grants for emerging filmmakers.

“There is a lack of faith and investment on behalf of the big corporations and studios – they should be putting money into film education to ensure that new talent comes through the pipeline.”

Lord Puttnam welcomed advances in technology that has allowed young filmmakers to create their own work and distribute it online.

“The amount of content being produced has increased sixfold in the past 30 years,” he said.

“When I was a young filmmaker, you were limited by the cost of film stock and the expense of hiring cameras and equipment.

“Now Griffith Film School is better equipped than most major studios were a few decade ago.

“The barrier to entry into the industry has dropped and there are great opportunities to show your work.”

Lord Putnam’s films have won 10 Academy Awards, 25 BAFTAs and the Palme d’Or at Cannes.

Producing for Screen and Society 2017 – Griffith Film School from Griffith Film School on Vimeo.

 

Slade in Flame, the 1975 film that charts the rise of a fictitious pop group, and co-produced by Lord Puttnam, has been described by film critic Mark Kermode as “the Citizen Kane of British pop movies”! Watch the clip below to see why! 

 

 

Source: RTS.co.uk – Written by Steve Clarke

Lord Puttnam has warned that the growing power of the US tech behemoths poses a threat to democracy.

In a high-concept, passionate RTS lecture, illustrated by film clips and quotes from such 20th century giants as John Maynard Keynes and Bob Dylan, Puttnam mounted a passionate case for media regulation to curb the excesses of “data capitalism.”

“Tech monopolies (Google, Amazon, Facebook) are taking over the internet. A pernicious form of corporatism could, under the wrong set of circumstances, replace democracy as we have known and enjoyed it,” he said.

It was “nonsense” that these companies were too big to regulate.  

“As democracy struggles data capitalism could well be proved to be uncontrollable. This is a very, very serious issue,” Puttnam claimed.

He said: “What on earth allows us to believe that the corporate state and corporatism left unchecked is going to provide for us a world that we actually want to live in? 

Lord Puttnam insisted that as a nation we are “sleep walking” to a world in which companies like Cambridge Analytica have the ability to manipulate public opinion via algorithms.  

He argued that only by exposing the lies of politicians by robust journalism and extending media regulation could citizens operate in a fully functioning democracy.

It was vital that companies like Facebook and Google accept they are media companies and the responsibilities which this entails.  

Once that happened, it would be easier to regulate these platforms.

Ofcom’s powers should be clarified and, if necessary, extended to avoid the rise of ‘phoney’ journalism online.

Digital literacy was paramount in an internet age, but to date Ofcom had not taken its responsibilities in this area seriously.

He said: “In the 2002-3 Communications Act we went to extraordinary lengths to ensure that one of the statutory responsibilities given to Ofcom was digital literacy.

“I have to say they have failed miserably. I don’t think it was ever taken seriously. It may well be that it was under-funded. But if it was somebody should have come back and told us.

“Digital literacy is now at a crisis point. We’ve got to address this.”

Impartial, accurate broadcast news was a fragile medium that needed to be protected.

He welcomed the BBC’s recent introduction of the Reality Check series, which aims to debunk fake news.

But Lord Puttnam asked why the corporation had taken so long to introduce it.  

“We all have a personal responsibility to question the facts offered to us. It’s a challenging but necessary discipline,” he said.

The reporting of the EU referendum had not been the BBC’s finest hour. “They were tortured over apparent balance,” he said. “A lot of things that should have got said weren’t.”

Lord Puttnam cited how the BBC had failed to show a clip of Boris Johnson giving his unqualified support to the EU.

“On a BBC programme five or six years ago Boris said: ‘It is absolutely vital that Turkey finds its rightful place in an ever-expanding Europe.’”

Puttnam wanted to know why during the referendum campaign Johnson wasn’t confronted with this on Newsnight.    

The Oscar-winning film director and educationalist predicted that Brexit would be a disaster for the British people.

He said that removing the protection the EU gives the UK to stand up to the giants of “data capitalism” was asking for trouble. 

On Brexit, he told the RTS how the Chinese think the UK is mad to leave the EU.  

Most of China’s population regard Europe as a place of stability in a troubled world, according to research Lord Puttnam quoted.     

“They think that this group of 28 nations can get together and work together and create peace in a region that has been tortured by war is a remarkable achievement and it gives them hope.

“Why on earth would we not wish to be part of that extraordinary global experiment? Believe me, they think we are mad,” he said.  

He insisted it was possible to avoid the excesses of the internet giants, but only if “every single one of us” upped our game.  

In a subsequent question and answer session, chaired by ex-culture minister Ed Vaizey, Lord Puttnam hailed the Financial Times as a beacon of journalistic excellence.

“If the FT is untruthful, it goes out of business. There is nowhere else for it to go. It is totally reliant on people’s belief in it.”

He added; “It’s trapped, if you like, in its own truth. Why shouldn’t that be true of other forms of communication?”  

 

 

Original Article: Daily Mail – written by Ray Connolly

One day in the early Seventies, I had a huge stroke of beginner’s luck. Going over to a friend’s house to borrow a book I was asked, over a cup of tea, if I would like to write a film. Just like that. Things like that weren’t unusual in those days.

The friend was David Puttnam who, after a successful career in advertising then as a photographers’ agent, had just become a film producer.

He had an idea that he thought might suit me.

Wild times: David Puttnam, Ringo Starr and David Essex. They are photographed in 1973

I knew a bit about movies, absolutely nothing about writing a screenplay, but I agreed to have a go at it. So we talked and, by the time I went home that afternoon, not only had we sketched out a vague plot, we also had a title for our film.

It would be called That’ll Be The Day, the inspiration for it came to David when he’d heard the Harry Nilsson song, 1941, which opens with the lyric: ‘Well, in 1941 a happy father had a son, And by 1944 the father walked right out the door…’

I knew Harry Nilsson and I also knew that the song went on to tell how, when the son grows up, he runs away to join a circus.

David, however, had another career suggestion for the boy. ‘What if in our story he joins a fair?’ That was it. We were off.

Like Nilsson we were both in our early 30s and the film would be set in the late Fifties — our teenage years of rainy beaches, coffee bars and fairgrounds. Did I think it would ever get made? At that time, having no idea of the eye-of-a-needle chances of any film script reaching the screen, I probably did.

If David, who was in partnership with Sandy Lieberson, the producer of the Mick Jagger film Performance, had any serious doubts he kept them from me with his enthusiasm.

What I didn’t anticipate was that when That’ll Be The Day came out it would be a huge hit, that it would make a star of a young stage actor of whom, when I’d begun writing, I’d never heard.

Nor could I have imagined that it would co-star a Beatle and would lead to a No.1 album and a best-selling novelisation for me.

At the time my day job was interviewing rock stars and anyone culturally cool for the London Evening Standard, so I would work on the screenplay late into the night. Then, a couple of times a week, David would come to my house for his breakfast to see what I’d come up with, scattering new ideas as he entered.

Week by week we would then ransack our own lives as we created the fictional character of Jim Maclaine. After about three months I had a first draft of the script. Unfortunately, however, the Jim Maclaine character hardly did a decent thing in the entire story. He was the ultimate selfish teenager.

We needed something to make him likeable.

At which point David Puttnam took his family to see a stage production of Godspell in the West End. He phoned first thing the next morning.

He’d found our boy. David Essex, the lead in Godspell, was so good looking and likeable an audience would forgive him anything.

The next problem was that I’d written about working in a holiday camp but I’d never even been to one, let alone worked in one.

Fortunately we knew two people who had — Ringo Starr, who’d been a drummer at a Butlin’s camp, and The Beatles’ former road manager, Neil Aspinall, who was now the managing director of their Apple records operation.

So we went to see Ringo and Neil who were so entertaining with their Butlin’s memories that we offered Ringo the second lead in the film, as a friendly Liverpudlian Jack-the-lad.

For his part, Neil agreed to help put together the band to play in our fictitious holiday camp — with Keith Moon on drums and Billy Fury doing the singing.

We had a director by now in Claude Whatham and, as I rewrote and rewrote the script as is usual in film-making, everything was coming together very nicely.

There was just one more problem — the perennial one in films. All the money wasn’t yet in place.

Budgeted at a little over £200,000, it was hardly going to be an expensive movie to make, but in 1972 the British film industry was deep in the doldrums.

Then a miracle occurred. Puttnam went to see a small Canadian television marketing company and proposed building our movie around a plethora of old hits they could promote as a tele-marketed compilation album.

They would pump more than £200,000 into an advertising campaign, showing clips from the film, so all we had to do was put together a 40-track soundtrack album of oldies but goldies.

We’d always planned to have some songs in the film, but 40!

Quickly, I began another draft of the script. If we continually moved our leading character around the fairground, from the dodgems to the whip, past the big wheel and round again to the carousel, we could add a few seconds of a different record onto the soundtrack everywhere he went.

Then, when he seduced a girl, we would cynically hear the Everly Brothers singing Devoted To You in the background. When he was roller-skating it was to Bobby Darin’s Dream Lover.

By the end of the final draft, we’d found a place for all 40 songs.

Filming was mainly on the Isle of Wight (because in the early Seventies the island still had a late Fifties look to it) and, despite some of Keith Moon’s excesses — he arrived by helicopter, while we all went on the ferry — it was a happy shoot. Ringo, who turned up for filming in his own Teddy Boy outfit, was a revelation. We’d no idea he could act so well.

The best night I can remember was when we took over a fairground in Southsea for filming and the entire cast and crew had free use of the dodgems with the music blaring.

A teenage fantasy come true.

The reviews when the film was released turned out to be another fantasy come true, with just about all the major critics, apart from the great Barry Norman, liking it.In truth, Barry had seen through some of the flaws in the film!

At the time, I was astonished by its success. A sixth-form drop-out, who throws his school books into a river when he should be sitting his A-level history, writes poetry in the rain while hiring out deck chairs and lets down just about absolutely everyone, was hardly an obvious subject. 

But, on reflection, I can now see there was nothing else like it at the time. And the music soundtrack was fantastic.

We hadn’t planned to make two films, but Puttnam saw a sequel as an opportunity to tell a story about the Sixties rock scene, something I’d been writing about as a journalist for the past six years.

And, coincidentally, at that very moment, David Essex was turning himself into a rock star.

He hadn’t sung in That’ll Be The Day, but to coincide with that film’s release, he’d co-written and recorded a song called Rock On, which by the summer of 1973 was high in the charts.

That August I joined Puttnam and his family on holiday in Italy while we sketched out the continuing story of Jim Maclaine.

This time we’d have a much bigger budget and wouldn’t only shoot in Britain, but also in Spain and America.

As it was a film about a rock band the first task, after the script had been written, was getting the new music recorded. We chose the Welsh musician Dave Edmunds to do that, virtually as a one-man band. It was extraordinary watching him play all the instruments.

We obviously wanted Ringo back, following his great success in That’ll Be The Day, but when he read the script for the new film, Stardust, he felt that having lived through the experience in reality as a member of The Beatles he wasn’t keen to revisit it.

Puttnam suggested Adam Faith for the role. The new director, Michael Apted, wasn’t sure and I was dead set against it. Most producers, at that point, would have said: ‘I don’t care what you think. I’m the producer. We’re getting Adam Faith’. And I would have been sent back to my typewriter.

But that isn’t how David Puttnam works. He likes writers. He likes having them involved as much as possible. So he suggested Apted and I meet Adam and get to know him. Reluctantly I agreed, whereupon Adam did to me what the character he was going to play in the film would do to all those who opposed him.

He chatted me out of my doubts. He was perfect in the part.

We thought Tony Curtis would be great in the part of the U.S. manager and went to meet him when he was in London.

He certainly looked and sounded as though he could play a New York Italian, which was how I’d envisaged the character.

He also seemed very keen on the role, but then his agent stepped in and demanded nearly half the budget of the film, just for him.

So, that was Tony Curtis out.

It was getting uncomfortably close to the start of filming and we still hadn’t cast the American manager when Columbia Pictures, who had a share in the film’s financing, suggested an actor called Larry Hagman. The name meant nothing to us. But he was apparently very popular in a U.S. TV series none of us had seen.

When we met him in a restaurant in Soho, we immediately realised that with his light brown hair and blue eyes he didn’t look or sound anything like the guy envisaged in the script. 

So, on the spot, we decided to rename and re-imagine the character, who’d been written as ‘Digillio from the Bronx’.

Now he became Porter Lee Austin, a name we arrived at because Larry had grown up in Austin, Texas, and his best friend there had been called Porter.

What Larry didn’t tell us until later was that all the way over from Los Angeles he’d been reading his lines to himself with a New York accent. Obviously, he would now be more comfortable playing the part as a Texan.

Filming began on a cold February morning in 1974 at a church in West London, where a few dozen extras had been hired to mob our fictional rock star Jim Maclaine, as played by David Essex, when he appeared. The money spent on the extras could have been saved.

As soon as David showed his face, hundreds of young local girls tried to jump on him as he fought his way to a waiting limousine.

That was the way it would be right through filming as our star’s fame just grew and grew.

In That’ll Be The Day, David had been an actor. Now he was a rock star playing another kind of rock star. It can’t have been easy for him, but he was dead right for us.

Keith Moon was also a rock star. In That’ll be The Day, he’d had quite a small part with one funny line.

Now his role was bigger and while his energy behind the drums and his general destructive anarchy gave a credibility to a film about rock music, his presence off-screen could be wearing.

Desperate to always be the centre of attention, he was spotted wandering naked and nonchalant at two in the morning around the bitterly cold garage of the Lancashire hotel where we were staying. He then ‘borrowed’ the tool bag from the unit carpenter and sawed the door of his hotel room in half, so he could hang his head out into the corridor like a horse in a stable. The hotel manager wasn’t best pleased nor was the film’s accountant, who had to pay for the damage.

You never quite knew where you were with Keith. He could be very friendly and very funny. But he could be a real pest, too.

One night when we were filming in Manchester, I was sitting on some low carpeted steps at Belle Vue when Michael asked me if I could keep an eye on him while the crew were setting up the next shot. Keith did have a habit of disappearing when he was needed.

Unfortunately Keith heard what the director said and came over to me, mocking, noisy and probably drunk. Irritated, my response was to say: ‘F*** off, Keith.’ That was a big mistake.

‘No one tells me to “f*** off”,’ he roared and launched a wild fist at me. Immediately, I pulled back on the shallow stairs, so that his arm only caught my shoulder.

But, now off-balance, he then fell across me and we began to tussle. The crew leapt to separate us.

What I remember most clearly is that as I tried to clout Keith back, the make-up artist rushed forward shouting, ‘Don’t hit his face. He’s been made up.’

Presumably a quick few jabs in his ribs would have been fine.

The next day, of course, we were best of friends again. He’d forgotten all about it. On reflection, I think he was probably in a worse state from drink and pills than we realised.

I bumped into him four years later in a bar in Chelsea where, his eyes wet, he was affectionate and crazy all at once, throwing pills into the air and trying to catch them in his mouth like a performing seal.

I wasn’t surprised, but I was sad, when a few weeks later I read that he had been found dead from an accidental drugs overdose.

The last day of filming for Stardust took place in Los Angeles, after which Larry Hagman invited some of us back to his rather wonderful house by the ocean in Malibu.

It was a very jolly evening and after dinner Larry led us all onto a veranda which overlooked the beach. Then, without warning, he and his wife suddenly took off all their clothes and, insisting we did the same, stepped into a Jacuzzi.

Coyly, we did as we were told, whereupon a couple of Larry’s neighbours arrived, got undressed and joined us . . . well, it was the Seventies.

When Stardust was released some months later, it was an even bigger success than That’ll Be The Day. 

It made a very big star of David Essex and resulted in another hit album and best-selling novelisation, while it would win for me a Writers’ Guild Of Great Britain award for the best original screenplay of 1974.

Those two films were Puttnam’s first two real hits. He would go on to produce 20 other movies, including Midnight Express, Chariots Of Fire, Local Hero, The Killing Fields and The Mission.

He won a clutch of Oscars, BAFTAS and the Palme D’Or at Cannes before, for a short while, becoming head of Columbia Pictures.

He is now Lord Puttnam, and for the past 20 years has worked in the field of education.

As for Larry Hagman, he would tell interviewers it was his performance as a Texan in Stardust that won him the part of JR Ewing in Dallas. A nice man, he even wrote and thanked us.

Which all goes to show, you never quite know what the consequences might be when you go around to a friend’s house to borrow a book.

n Ray Connolly’s adaptation for radio of his screenplay for That’ll Be The Day is on Radio 4 today at 2.30pm. His adaptation of his screenplay for Stardust will be broadcast on Radio 4 on Saturday, September 30. 

The free exhibition will allow visitors to go behind the scenes of the film industry

Source: Standard.co.uk

A free exhibition giving a glimpse behind the scenes of the British film industry aims to inspire future movie makers.

Secrets Of The Movies will have SpongeBob SquarePants, Paddington Bear and other characters in costume, as well as animation, make-up and stage fighting workshops, a model cinema made of 25,000 Lego bricks, and a display of film poster art.

It is organised by the Film Distributors’ Association, whose chairman, Oscar-winning producer Lord Puttnam, said: “You never know specifically what inspires young people, but hopefully this exhibition will cover enough topics to do so.”

Secrets Of The Movies is open every weekday from today until August 24 at The Gallery Soho in Charing Cross Road.

 

Lord David Puttnam has today (20 July) been awarded an Honorary Doctorate of Bath Spa University for his outstanding achievements in the Creative Industries.

Lord Puttnam at the Honorary Doctorate Ceremony, Bath Spa

Lord Puttnam teaches on the MA Independent Filmmaking and MA Scriptwriting courses at Bath Spa University through his online education platform, Atticus Education.
Lord Puttnam was proposed by Professor Christina Slade, Vice-Chancellor and presented with his Honorary Doctorate by Bath Spa University’s Chancellor, Oscar-winning actor Jeremy Irons with whom he worked on the multi award winning film, The Mission.
In her oration, Professor Slade said: “At Bath Spa University we are nurturing and developing the next generation of creative talent to work in film and television, and to tell stories on other platforms in our ever-more connected world.
“We want our graduates to be ethical, globally engaged and emotionally intelligent, so it’s important that they have role models who have changed the world through their art and their actions.
“David Puttnam is the ideal role model – a person who has devoted his life to creativity and the greater good.”
Commenting on his honorary doctorate, Lord Puttnam said: “I’m incredibly honoured to receive this Honorary Doctorate, most especially in the presence of one of my oldest, most admired and valued friends, the Chancellor of Bath Spa University, Jeremy Irons.”
 

 

Data danger lurking in Sky deal

A great deal has been written about the proposed 21st Century Fox takeover of Sky, but one important aspect has gone unremarked, namely the safety and security of personal data held by a British company once that company has passed to foreign control.

Sky possesses what is probably the UK’s largest and most sophisticated privately held domestic consumption database. It is one from which huge insight can be derived on the opinions and personality of the household. Domestic content consumption data is particularly powerful because one’s behaviour at home is a more authentic representation of personality and opinions than an individual’s public persona reflected in social media. That data allows it to track the leisure time preferences and behaviours of every one of its subscriber households. This asset, as used by a well-run and well-regulated organisation such as Sky, with no apparent political agenda, represents no especial problem. But allow that data to fall into the hands of an owner with an appetite for political leverage and the temptations and opportunities for misuse become great .

Present legislation has failed to keep pace with technological developments. We believe that, over the coming 12 months, the government will seek to energetically address this issue as well as attempt to strengthen and clarify the criteria by which Ofcom will, in future, apply its “fit and proper” test.

We seek an absolute assurance that, prior to making any final decision as to whether to refer the Fox/Sky deal to the Competition and Markets Authority, the secretary of state for digital, culture, media and sport has fully consulted and taken advice from the information commissioner on the implications of the proposed takeover and that advice be made available to parliament, Ofcom and the CMA. We believe there is an urgent need to ensure that, in the view of the information commissioner, sufficient safeguards and sanctions are already in place to prevent Sky’s rich dataset on the behaviours and consumption habits of over 13 million households in the UK and Ireland being in any way misused or misapplied.
Lord Holmes of Richmond, Baroness Kennedy of the Shaws, Baroness Kidron, Lord Lansley, Lord McNally, Lord Puttnam

Rupert Murdock

One of the “largest and most sophisticated datasets in the country” – including the TV viewing, internet and phone records of 13 million households – could be misused for political purposes if Rupert Murdoch is allowed to proceed with his plan to buy out Sky, six members of the House of Lords claim in a letter to the Observer.

The government’s decision on whether to allow the takeover of the broadcaster by Murdoch’s 21st Century Fox may come as early as next week, but a cross-party group of peers led by the film-maker David Puttnam – who was involved in drafting the 2003 Telecommunications Act – have joined forces to highlight what they say is a significant oversight with potentially huge ramifications. Fox currently owns 39% of Sky.

The letter says that “Sky possess what is probably the UK’s largest and most sophisticated privately held domestic consumption database”, able to “track the leisure time preferences and behaviour” of a large proportion of the population of the UK and Ireland.But the safety and security of that data is threatened, the letter says, if “passed into foreign control”. It warns that should it “fall into the hands of an owner with an appetite for political leverage, the temptations and opportunities for misuse become very great indeed”.

Puttnam said: “The deal would give unregulated access to this huge database from which an enormous amount of insight could be extracted. With that information, people can be individually targeted with advertisements personalised to them. And we have this unbelievable situation where we have no regulation of political advertisements, so a party can tell any lie they want.

“I do see this as a very grave threat to our democratic process. What is incredible is this hasn’t been considered at any point. If you look at the asset value of Sky, you suddenly go, ‘Well, hang on there, here’s a bit of unbelievable value but it hasn’t been included in the price’.”

The letter says there is an “urgent need” for the Information Commissioner to confirm data cannot be “misused or misapplied” before a Sky decision is made. It comes as the use of personal data by political parties has come under increasing scrutiny. The FBI and Senate intelligence committee are investigating if this data was used by the Russian government to target US voters. The Information Commissioner’s Office here launched an investigation into the micro-targeting of individual voters with personalised messages after a series of articles in theObserver.

The company at the heart of both US and UK investigations – Cambridge Analytica – is owned by a hedgefund billionaire and Trump donor, Robert Mercer. He is a close associate of Murdoch and Cambridge Analytica’s US office was previously located in Murdoch’s Newscorp building. The Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport told Puttnam it was awaiting the IC’s report into political use of data, though it is not due to be delivered until the autumn – after a Sky decision is made.

David Carroll, a professor at Parsons School of Design at The New School in New York, who is involved in legal efforts to uncover how companies use individuals’ data for political purposes, said that the deal would see the UK take a big step towards “the American business model of total deregulation and total consolidation. This huge infrastructure has grown up where you can micro-target ads based on this hugely detailed knowledge about households, and it’s absolutely out of control when it’s applied to political messages. People don’t appreciate how their entire consumer profile is attached to their household identity.

“There is no privacy. These companies know exactly who we are. What we’ve seen in the US with Trump and Cambridge Analytica is how this is used by political players.”

Chi Onwurah, the shadow minister for business, innovation and skills and former head of telecoms technology at Ofcom, said that the value and significance of the data in the Fox/Sky deal hadn’t been taken into account in the government’s consideration of the deal.

“The whole of competition law is based on buying services. So what isn’t reflected anywhere in this process is that we exchange our data for services. It’s hugely valuable, but it’s been completely hidden on the balance sheet. It’s a massive fiduciary theft, in a way. It’s not being sold for the value that it has. And the ramifications of that incredibly valuable data being controlled by vested interests has not even been considered.”

Phil Westcott, managing director of an AI consultancy firm, Filament, who advises companies on how to handle emerging technology, said that what was most alarming was that a single company would own not just this “incredibly rich dataset” but also “all the main information channels into people’s lives”. Although Ofcom bans political advertising on TV, Lord Puttnam said the definition of what is political is a grey area and Westcott points out that at a single stroke Murdoch would gain control of the entire information environment of millions of people.

“He would control people’s access to the internet, TV, digital radio and emails. As an internet service provider, you can speed up or slow down certain websites to control what people see. And if you own all these channels, you’d be able to influence people very subtly. It wouldn’t even necessarily be overtly politically, it could just nudge you in a certain direction by filtering the messaging you receive. And those messages could be completely different from the person next door. What I find most scary about this is how certain news and information could simply be filtered out.”

Source: The Guardian

 

NFTS building with a SKY sign

David Puttnam named school’s life president.

MP and former culture minister Ed Vaizey has officially opened two new National Film And Television School (NFTS) buildings on the school’s campus in Beaconsfield.

Titled the Channel 4 Rose Building, after the late senior commissioning editor and Channel 4 David Rose, and Sky Studios at the NFTS respectively, the buildings are part of a £20m development at the School.

At an event held this morning (July 7) on site, David Puttnam was named life president of the NFTS.

The new school facilities include a 4K Digital Content Studio, two teaching buildings, a second cinema, and supplementary teaching space.

Funding for the project form the DCMS (Department for Culture Media and Spor), Channel 4, Sky, and the Buckinghamshire Thames Valley Local Enterprise Partnership, with additional funding from partners including the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE), the British Film Institute (BFI), Creative Skillset, the Broccoli Foundation/NFTS Foundation, Garfield Weston Foundation, Fidelity UK, Wolfson Foundation, NBC Universal, and the David Lean Foundation.

Ed Vaizey commented: “I’m thrilled to be opening these new buildings. The NFTS is one of the world’s leading film schools, and these new facilities will ensure it continues to provide an unrivalled film education to students from all around the world, as well as maintaining the UK’s justified reputation for film making.”

Stephen Louis, vice-chairman of the School’s board of governors, said: “The opening of these state-of-the-art facilities is an important milestone for the NFTS and will ensure it can continue to build its worldwide reputation for delivering excellent film, TV and games education.”

Lord Puttnam added: “I’m delighted to accept the Presidency of an organisation with which I’ve been deeply engaged from the very start.  The NFTS is one of our genuinely world-class creative sector organisations and I’m honoured to follow in the footsteps of Lord Attenborough as the school’s President.”

In April this year, long-serving NFTS director Nik Powell stepped down after 14 years at the helm. Jon Wardle was subsequently announced as his successor in May.

Source: Screen Daily

Blessed by a brilliant marriage, which resulted in an adored and adoring family he had no need, nor time, for rancour.

He was born into the world of cinema, so as the son of a fine director he knew better than most the passion and disappointment that went into the production of every movie – good and bad.

In hindsight my generation of filmmakers were incredibly fortunate to have enjoyed the understanding and support of a tough, sometimes unforgiving, but ultimately generous group of critics.

Philip French, Derek Malcolm, David Robinson, Alexander Walker, along with Barry, all went out of their way to seek out and promote the emergence of a cinema that was outward looking in both its subject matter and respect for its audience.

To me, through the best and worst of times, Barry was never less than a witty and affectionate friend.

I think I understood him best when, on a Film Night special in early 1982 we debated the future of the industry we both loved.

 

 

As I laid out my own thoughts on what I believed lay ahead his eyes grew wider and wider in almost pantomime consternation.

Like me he’d grown up in an era in which the local cinema was a smoky haven of silver imagery, drying raincoats, blue smoke haze and an almost religious silence.

I don’t believe he was ever able to embrace the world of DVD’s, let alone ‘streaming’ – and the idea of people checking their mobile phones, and popping in and out of the concession stand while the movie was playing, would have been anathema to him.

Barry enjoyed the best of cinema at a time when, for the most part, it returned his love.

Much as I and his legion of devoted friends will miss him, with cinema subsuming its cultural potential to a spasm of sequels and masked hero’s, he probably chose a good time to leave.

David Puttnam

STATEMENT FROM LORD PUTTNAM

Re statement by Karen Bradley, Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport on the proposed merger between 21st Century Fox and Sky – 29.06.2017

21st century fox logo white on black

I welcome the Secretary of State’s ‘minded-to’ decision to refer the proposed merger of 21st Century Fox and Sky for a fuller Phase 2 investigation by the Competition and Markets Authority on the grounds of media plurality.

I am surprised and very concerned, however, that the Secretary of State is minded-not-to-refer the merger to the CMA on the grounds of broadcasting standards.

Ofcom’s observations of ‘significant failings of the corporate culture’ at Fox News in its ‘fit and proper’ assessment are extremely troubling. As the Shadow Secretary of State remarked:

“If the executives who ran a company involved in systematic and widespread criminality, including phone hacking and police bribery, can pass the fit and proper test, it begs the question – is the test itself fit for purpose?”

As the Shadow Secretary of State’s remarks suggest, it is very possible that the regulatory regime itself is no longer ‘fit for purpose’;  that being the case, should this merger ‘slip through’, the nation will have to live with the effects of those failings for many years to come.

Finally, one question does not seem to have been addressed and that is the scale and nature of the commercial and political benefits that could accrue to the Murdoch family from access to Sky’s vast database of almost thirteen million households in the UK and the Republic of Ireland.

This could represent unaccountable power of a very different order to that which has ever existed in the past.

I believe that rather than accepting any revised undertakings in lieu, the Secretary of State should now make a final decision to refer the proposed merger, both on the grounds of plurality and broadcasting standards, to the CMA on the basis that only a full, detailed investigation, with sufficient time for proper scrutiny, and a comprehensive understanding of the implications of the contemporary world of digital media, will do justice to the public interest.